THE  FORMER  IRS  DIRECTOR

ADMITTED

THAT  TAXES  ARE  VOLUNTARY

So how do you properly use this. ???
________________________________________

T O N I G H T S        D I S C U S S I O N

GETTING  RID  OF  IRS  LIENS/LEVIES  THREATS BECAUSE  TAXES  ARE  INDIRECT  TAXES!!

We talked about getting rid of liens/levies because income taxes are indirect taxes 

We continue that discussion and cover 4 Supreme Court cases that should force the IRS to cease and desist collection efforts against someone.  

Ø     Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 US 103, 112-113 (1916).

Ø     Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 9 (1916

Ø     Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co., 157 U.S. 429, 558 (1895).

Ø     Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189, 219-220 (1920). 

IS  THE  IRS  TAX  AN  INDIRECT  TAX?

See example below

IS  THE  IRS  TAX  VOLUNTARY

AS STATED BY THE FORMER IRS COMMISSIONER

ON MAY 22, 2013?

~*~

SPEAKER: Mr. Tony Davis 

~*~

 In 1916 the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax legislation that was enacted is constitutional because the tax that was laid was not laid as a direct tax under the 16th Amendment, but because the legislation that was actually enacted, was laid as an indirect tax.

Ø     Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 US 103, 112-113 (1916)

Ø     Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 9 (1916)

The court further identifies that the income tax legislation actually enacted is clearly and obviously an indirect tax because it is laid in the form of a tariff.

EXAMPLE:  IS THE IRS TAX AN INDIRECT TAX?

Sample letter to the IRS regarding letters assessing tax:

To:  Internal Revenue Service

From:  xxxx

RE:  Form letter xxxx

Account Number:  xxxx

Dear Sir/Ms.

I am in receipt of your letter dated xxxx regarding my previous correspondence.  You stated you are working on a reply to my inquiries and concerns.  I am providing you additional information to support my position.

In 1916 the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax legislation that was enacted is constitutional because the tax that was laid was not laid as a direct tax under the 16th Amendment, but because the legislation that was actually enacted, laid an indirect tax: 

      "...by the previous ruling, it was settled that the provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged." Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 US 103, 112-113 (1916).. 

The Court further identifies that the income tax legislation actually enacted is clearly and obviously an indirect tax because it is laid in the form of a tariff.

     "....the appellant filed his bill to enjoin the corporation from complying with the income tax provisions of the tariff act as of October 3, 1913."  Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 9 (1916). 

This is part of an 11 page Memorandum plus 14 pages of attachments used to remove proposed assessments, proposed liens and levies, and proposed charges against your wages and social security.  Much more will be discussed tonight, Tuesday.

 ~*~

For more information on NOT volunteering information to the IRS and how to use the information to your benefit then tune in to www.FreedomsRadio.com.   

Other tools are available. 

If you understand the law, you can win!!

Tune in for more exciting information.

~*~

YRIITL has been serving the American community for over 7 years to secure the very best in Information Providers to assist you and to teach you how to deal with court related matters. Our Students are simply the best informed, bar none.

~*~

For more information .......  

Contact: Martin Michaelsson:

MM@YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com

 
Brought to you by....

www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com 

________________________________________